In Defense of H.O.T. Theory: A Second Reply to Adams and Shreve (pages 231-239)

Rocco J. Gennaro

ABSTRACT: In Gennaro (2016), I had originally replied to Fred Adams and Charlotte Shreve’s (2016) paper entitled “What Can Synesthesia Teach Us About Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?,” previously published in Symposion. I argued that H.O.T. theory does have the resources to account for synesthesia and the specific worries that they advance in their paper, such as the relationship between concepts and experience and the ability to handle instances of ‘pop-out’ experiences. They counter-reply in Adams and Shreve (2017) and also raise further objections to H.O.T. theory which go well beyond the scope of their 2016 paper. In this paper, I offer additional replies to the points they raise in Adams and Shreve (2017).

application-pdf Download PDF

About Rocco J. Gennaro

Check Also

Can It Be that Tully=Cicero? (pages 149-150)

Alex Blum ABSTRACT: We show, that given two fundamental theses of Kripke, no statement of …